OPINION | The Corporate Fog at Gwadar: Why Ownership Transparency Matters

by Cmde Ranjit Rai

Gwadar is promoted as a flagship for economic growth. Yet it is also a place where it’s unusually easy to lose track of who owns and operates what. The port and its adjoining free zone are run under a long-term concession by China Overseas Ports Holding Company (COPHC), which oversees Gwadar International Terminals, Gwadar Marine Services, and the Gwadar Free Zone Company. This corporate structure is legal and publicly disclosed—but it exists within a policy environment that grants special tax and customs privileges, reducing day-to-day visibility over trade activity.

Pakistan’s own regulations support low-friction commerce in Gwadar. Federal notifications and investment guidance outline broad tax and customs exemptions for capital goods and materials entering the port and free zone, as well as customized “tax-free zone” benefits. Incentives like these are common tools for attracting industry. But they also shift compliance responsibilities from border authorities to individual firms—meaning accurate company-level records become the core safeguard.

This raises a key question: Do company records in Pakistan reliably show who actually controls a business? The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) has recently strengthened beneficial-ownership rules and Know Your Customer requirements. These reforms are aligned with international standards, requiring firms to maintain and file information on their “true owners.”

However, public evaluations still highlight gaps. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and its regional counterparts have reviewed Pakistan’s compliance since the 2019 mutual evaluation. While progress is recognized, FATF continues to focus on whether beneficial-ownership transparency is effective in practice. Exiting the “grey list” does not eliminate scrutiny; countries are expected to keep tightening controls and closing loopholes.

Professional guidance inside Pakistan also acknowledges risks. Compliance manuals and AML notes caution that nominee directors, layered cross-border ownership structures, and opaque control chains can hide real owners. Local legal scholarship underscores that nominee arrangements and shell companies can obstruct oversight and enforcement. None of this suggests wrongdoing by any specific company in Gwadar—but it does illustrate how standard corporate structuring can create opacity.

This matters because the free zone interacts with sensitive commodities. Pakistan’s own reporting acknowledges the presence and import of chemical precursors such as ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. Meanwhile, UN and International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) assessments warn that South Asia faces diversion risks for chemicals used to produce heroin and synthetic drugs. These warnings are general rather than Gwadar-specific, but when beneficial-ownership transparency is incomplete and trade processes are streamlined, the room for abuse widens.

Special economic zones also involve trade-offs in governance. World Bank analyses note fragmented responsibilities, weak logistics oversight, and inconsistent coordination across Pakistan’s zones. While designed for efficiency, this fragmentation can diffuse accountability. Different entities—customs authorities, zone administrators, company registries—hold separate parts of the oversight puzzle. In that environment, layered companies can exploit gaps: one entity imports goods, another stores them, another sells them. Each step may be legal in isolation, but together they obscure the total picture.

Meanwhile, Pakistan has made it fast and inexpensive to incorporate companies—sometimes within hours. Streamlined business creation is not inherently a problem. But where rapid incorporation intersects with limited verification of beneficial control, there is potential for “identity laundering,” in which the same controlling actors appear through different names, nominees, or corporate layers. That is why global standards emphasize not just efficiency but reliable ownership transparency.

None of this claims that the Gwadar Free Zone hosts criminal actors, nor that specific firms are engaged in smuggling. No evidence supports broad accusations. What the public record does support is a structural reality: free-zone incentives shift oversight downstream, beneficial-ownership systems are still maturing, nominee structures pose known risks, and the commodity environment includes substances classified as diversion-prone. Together, these conditions allow hollow trading firms to move sensitive inputs under seemingly ordinary industrial transactions while obscuring real control.

The solution is not to slow legitimate trade—it is to strengthen transparency where it matters most.

Policy priorities:

1. Make beneficial-ownership data useful in practice by enabling real-time verification, including for free-zone entities.

2. Integrate zone-level customs and corporate registry systems so import declarations can be immediately linked to verified ownership records.

3. Flag high-risk ownership patterns such as nominee directors, frequent changes in control, and multi-layered jurisdiction chains with no clear economic rationale.

4. Prioritize oversight for high-risk chemical precursors using end-use verification and post-clearance audits that trace goods beyond the port gate.

Pakistan has made meaningful progress since 2019 and is strongly incentivized to keep Gwadar both open and compliant. But the evidence suggests that opacity in the free-zone environment is not incidental—it is the result of policy choices that prioritize speed, exemptions, and minimal interface friction. Without balancing these choices with verifiable ownership data and targeted controls, future claims of surprise over chemical diversion will be difficult to defend.

---

About Author

Commodore Ranjit B Rai (Retd) is the author of the book 'The Indian Navy @75: Reminiscing the Voyage. He is an RNSC-qualified officer who served as Director Naval Intelligence and Director Naval Operations and writes on maritime matters. He also served as India Representative of Waterman Steam Ships USA and curated a New Delhi Maritime Museum.